CASE 0847 — ROOM-COMPARISON TRAINING PACKET (v3)

Read C_complaint.txt first. This is a fictional transaction built around an unchanged presenter-supplied photograph comparison. The actual property's identity and history are not established. Never associate the fictional people or allegations with actual persons.

Letters identify exhibits. Numbers identify passages: A-1 means paragraph 1 of exhibit A.

A  A_listing.txt            Listing: A-1 pendant included; A-2 staging disclosure; A-3 scenario note.
B  B_photo-review.txt       Photo observations: B-1 fixture; B-2 floor cover; B-3 trim, walls, floor; B-4 apparent size; B-5 same-room anchors.
C  C_complaint.txt          Buyer complaint: C-1 the promised light; C-2 what else was different; C-3 what the buyer asks.
D  D_buyer-message.txt      Buyer's March 3 question: D-1 "Is the hanging light staying?"; D-2 no reply supplied.
E  E_room-comparison.jpg    The unchanged supplied photo.
   E_image-record.txt       Provenance: E-1 the file; E-2 fictional roles and dates; E-3 what is unknown.
F  F_licensee-interview.txt Licensee interview: F-1 staging explanation; F-2 fixture; F-3 lens and lighting.

B and E are analyst notes on the same image; they do not corroborate each other.

NOT INCLUDED (request these): original image files; full listing and its version history; photo-vendor edit instructions; seller's fixture schedule and the purchase contract's fixture terms; dated, unedited site photos; room measurements; camera and lens details. Absence from this packet does not establish nonexistence.
